StayCurrentMD · Trauma Talk Summary: Update Course 2017
Follow
Video·Published Sep 2017Older

Trauma Talk Summary: Update Course 2017

With Dr. Christian Streck · hosted by Dr. Todd Ponsky
Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to blunt abdominal trauma · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →
Only a few other public items share this expert — go deeper there →
What the experts said27 expert statements · 4 host summaries
97% of pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting to trauma centers are hemodynamically stable
EpidemiologicalChristian Streck
A seat belt contusion indicates tremendous force generated against the patient and requires vigilance for underlying abdominal injury
Clinical
Bowel injury is difficult to assess on CT scan even when solid organ injuries can be identified
ClinicalChristian Streck
FAST ultrasound is not sensitive or specific enough for pediatric abdominal trauma evaluation
Clinical
IV contrast for ultrasound may improve FAST utility in the future but is not currently helpful
Opinion
Patients evaluated only by the emergency department (lowest tier activations) receive more labs and sometimes more imaging than higher-tier activations
Clinical
A seat belt sign over the anterior superior iliac spine (correct position) may represent only soft tissue injury and can be observed, whereas a seat belt sign in the wrong position (higher on abdomen) is more concerning
Clinical
The seat belt should be positioned over the bony pelvis; this is why booster seats are used in children
Clinical
Less than 12% of pediatric patients scanned for blunt abdominal trauma have an intra-abdominal injury
EpidemiologicalChristian Streck
Fewer than 3% of pediatric blunt trauma patients with severe mechanisms have an injury requiring acute intervention
EpidemiologicalChristian Streck
90% of pediatric trauma patients present to non-pediatric centers where pan-CT is standard practice
EpidemiologicalChristian Streck
CT scan ordering rates for pediatric blunt abdominal trauma varied from 4% to 96% across 14 participating trauma centers
EpidemiologicalChristian Streck
The 2012 PECARN prediction model using only history and physical exam was very sensitive for injuries requiring acute intervention but missed many clinically relevant solid organ injuries
ClinicalChristian Streck
Five variables predict intra-abdominal injury: AST >200, abnormal abdominal physical exam, abnormal chest X-ray, abdominal pain, and elevated amylase or lipase
ClinicalChristian Streck
When all five prediction variables are negative, the risk of intra-abdominal injury is 0.6% and risk of injury requiring acute intervention is 0%
ClinicalChristian Streck
The five-variable model identifies 34% of pediatric blunt trauma patients who can safely avoid abdominal CT
ClinicalChristian Streck
The negative predictive value of the five-variable model was 100% for injury requiring intervention and 99.4% for all injuries
ClinicalChristian Streck
A modified low-risk group (55% of patients) with fewer than all five variables positive has less than 5% risk of any injury and less than 0.3% risk of injury requiring acute intervention
ClinicalChristian Streck
Clinicians can wait up to one hour for laboratory results (AST, lipase) before deciding on abdominal CT in stable patients with reliable exams
ClinicalChristian Streck
Oral contrast does not add diagnostic value for identifying small bowel or colonic injuries in pediatric blunt trauma
ClinicalChristian Streck
Modern multi-slice CT scanners typically show subtle findings (even without free air) that raise concern for hollow viscus injury
ClinicalChristian Streck
Serial abdominal examinations over 6-12 hours can help determine need for operative intervention even when CT findings are equivocal
Clinical
Bowel injury, although significant, is not immediately life-threatening and can be safely observed for several hours before definitive management
Clinical
Laparoscopy is extremely helpful in 2017 for patients with moderate free fluid and no hard signs of small bowel perforation
ClinicalChristian Streck
It is very rare to miss an injury during laparoscopic exploration of pediatric abdominal trauma
OpinionTodd Ponsky
Either amylase or lipase is acceptable for pancreatic injury screening; institutions vary in which enzyme they use
ClinicalChristian Streck
The five-variable prediction model has been validated in the publicly available PECARN dataset with significant negative predictive value
ClinicalChristian Streck
The CHOP study established that if either AST or ALT is over 200, abdominal CT should be obtained
Host summaryThe host summarizing the discussion · not cited in answers
Adult trauma literature suggests pan-CT is safer, has fewer missed injuries, and is more cost-effective
Host summaryChristian Streck summarizing the discussion · not cited in answers
An APSA study supports that missed bowel injury diagnosed within 24 hours does not increase morbidity
Host summaryChristian Streck summarizing the discussion · not cited in answers
There is huge variability across institutions in laboratory evaluation practices for pediatric blunt abdominal trauma
Host summaryTodd Ponsky summarizing the discussion · not cited in answers